Explore / Study / Economics / Macroeconomics 701 words | 4 minutes

§16 Exchange Rate Regimes

  1. Fixed Exchange Rates
  2. Mundell-Fleming Model
  3. Fixed Exchange Rate Regime
  4. Speculative Attacks
  5. Flexible Exchange Rates Can Be Volatile
  6. Choosing Between Exchange Rate Regimes

Fixed Exchange Rates

  • Some countries peg their currency to a major currency (typically the US dollar).

  • If credible, then Ee=E=EE^e = E = \overline{E} , which implies (from interest parity condition):

    1=1+i1+i    i=i1 = \frac{1 + i}{1 + i^*} \implies i = i^*

  • Under a fixed exchange rate and perfect capital mobility, the domestic interest rate is equal to the foreign interest rate.

  • This means the central bank gives up monetary policy as a policy instrument.

Mundell-Fleming Model

  • Equilibrium in goods markets with fixed prices

    Y=C(YT)+I(Y,i)+G+NX(Y,Y,E)=C(YT)+I(Y,i)+G+NX(Y,Y,1+i1+iEe)\begin{aligned} Y &= C(Y - T) + I(Y, i) + G + NX(Y, Y^*, E) \\ &= C(Y - T) + I(Y, i) + G + NX \left( Y, Y^*, \frac{1 + i}{1 + i^*} \overline{E}^e \right) \end{aligned}

    where we used the interest parity condition:

    E=1+i1+iEeE = \frac{1 + i}{1 + i^*} \overline{E}^e

Fixed Exchange Rate Regime

  • What if the country is in a fixed exchange rate regime, with a credible E=Ee=EE = E^e = \overline{E} ?

  • Fiscal policy still works.

  • But the country has no independent monetary policy to fight its domestic recession!

    E=1+i1+iEi=i\overline{E} = \frac{1 + i}{1 + i^*} \overline{E} \Rightarrow i = i^*

Speculative Attacks

  • What if the country is in a fixed exchange rate regime, but speculators think the peg will not last: EeEE^e \ll \overline{E} ?

    E=1+i1+iEeii\overline{E} = \frac{1 + i}{1 + i^*} E^e \Rightarrow i \gg i^*

  • The country has to hike interest rates and cause a deeper recession to defend its peg!… Or devalue (e.g. the UK and the EMS)

Flexible Exchange Rates Can Be Volatile

  • Up to now it sounds as if it makes no sense to have a fixed exchange rate: no independent monetary policy, speculative attacks…

  • But flexible exchange rates can be very volatile, which is costly for a variety of reasons: planning is more complex, inflation is less anchored in very open economies, NX less predictable, etc.

  • Recall the uncovered interest parity condition:

    Et=1+it1+itEt+1e;Et+1e=1+it+1e1+it+1eEt+2e;E_t = \frac{1 + i_t}{1 + i^*_t} E^e_{t+1}; \quad E^e_{t+1} = \frac{1 + i^e_{t+1}}{1 + i^{*e}_{t+1}} E^e_{t+2}; \quad \ldots

Et=1+it1+it1+it+1e1+it+1e1+it+2e1+it+2e1+it+ne1+it+neEt+n+1eE_t = \frac{1 + i_t}{1 + i^*_t} \frac{1 + i^e_{t+1}}{1 + i^{*e}_{t+1}} \frac{1 + i^e_{t+2}}{1 + i^{*e}_{t+2}} \ldots \frac{1 + i^e_{t+n}}{1 + i^{*e}_{t+n}} E^e_{t+n+1}

  • The future matters a bit too much for some economies and events.

Choosing Between Exchange Rate Regimes

  • Loosing independent monetary policy is less costly if:
    • Macroeconomics shocks are very similar across the pegged economies (e.g. Euro area);
    • Plenty of fiscal capacity (e.g. HK);
    • Or very flexible labor/goods markets (e.g. HK).
      • Why? because fixed nominal exchange rate does not mean fixed real exchange rate.
  • Gaining nominal exchange rate stability is particularly important if:
    • There is a lot of trade across regions;
    • Cross financial exposure;
    • Unanchored inflation (depreciation) expectations.

— Apr 24, 2025

Creative Commons License
§16 Exchange Rate Regimes by Lu Meng is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at About.